|
課程名稱 |
英美法導論
INTRODUCTION TO ANGLO-AMERICAN LAW |
|
開課學期 |
98-1 |
|
授課對象 |
法律學院 法學組 |
|
授課教師 |
張文貞 |
|
課號 |
LAW2120 |
|
課程識別碼 |
A01E29100 |
|
班次 |
|
|
學分 |
2 |
|
全/半年 |
半年 |
|
必/選修 |
必修 |
|
上課時間 |
星期四5,6(12:20~14:10) |
|
上課地點 |
法1403 |
|
備註 |
本課程以英語授課。
總人數上限：50人 |
|
Ceiba 課程網頁 |
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/981anglo_americanlaw |
|
課程簡介影片 |
|
|
核心能力關聯 |
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖 |
|
課程大綱
|
|
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
|
|
課程概述 |
This course is designed to provide students with an introductory understanding of Anglo-American law. It starts with a rather detailed discussion of the establishment of modern judicial review and the workings of the United States Supreme Court. Next, general features in common law development and procedures will be taught. The third part of this course is devoted to an understanding of how judicial power exercised in common law jurisdictions (particularly in the American federal legal system). Lastly, some of the important developments in Anglo-American legal culture and education will be discussed.
|
|
課程目標 |
Based upon the Socratic teaching method, this course requires student participation in class discussion. Students must read assignments before coming to the class. In order to facilitate class participation, students will be divided into groups with scheduled assignments. In addition, students must submit case briefs or reflective notes in English several times as required in the course syllabus. It should be noted that all of the instructions, class discussions and the writings of mid-term brief and final exam will be conducted in English, which has been the tradition of this course in NTU law department. This requirement is by no means to discriminate students with rather poor capacity in English, but, instead, is intended to be a better way to provide students with an accommodating learning environment, in which they feel comfortable in learning and making legal arguments in English. |
|
課程要求 |
Class participation is not only required but also evaluated. Students who take this course for credit must be well prepared for each class and participate in class discussion. Class participation & reflection note (35%), mid-term exam (35%) and final exam (30%) would be included accordingly into final evaluation and grades. |
|
預期每週課後學習時數 |
|
|
Office Hours |
每週四 15:30~17:30 |
|
指定閱讀 |
As shown in the weekly schedule |
|
參考書目 |
As shown in the weekly schedule |
|
評量方式
(僅供參考) |
|
No. |
項目 |
百分比 |
說明 |
|
1. |
Final exam |
30% |
|
2. |
Mid-term exam |
35% |
|
3. |
Class participation & reflection note |
35% |
|
|
|
週次 |
日期 |
單元主題 |
|
第1週 |
9/17 |
Course Introduction |
|
第2週 |
9/24 |
1. Introduction: the beginning of modern judicial review
*Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803).
*Appendix: The How, Why and What to Briefing and Citing Court Cases
|
|
第3週 |
10/1 |
Continue the discussion on Marbury v. Madison
*Box: How to locate decisions of the Supreme Court
*Box: Constitutional history
*The United States Constitution and Amendments
--------------10/5 before 4 pm: submission of Case Brief on Marbury v. Madison |
|
第4週 |
10/8 |
Week Four to Seven: 10/8, 10/15, 10/22, 10/29
2. Common law, equity & the development of the Anglo-American judicial system
2.1 The Common law courts and the writ system
2.2 Equitable jurisdiction and the court of chancery
2.3 The development of modern English and American Courts
2.4 The distinctive procedure in civil & criminal actions of modern American courts
10/8
*Peter Shears & Graham Stephenson, James’ Introduction to English Law 23-29 (13th ed., 1996).
*C.H. Beck & Manz Stampfli, Introduction to Anglo-American Law & Language 206-208 (2nd ed., 2001).
*Bodenheimer et al., An Introduction to the Anglo-American Legal System: Readings & Cases 60-68 (4th ed., 2001).
*Figure: The two main routes of the Supreme Court
*Figure: The judicial map of the U.S. courts of appeal and U.S. district courts |
|
第5週 |
10/15 |
*Margaret Z. Johns & Rex R. Perschbacher, The United States Legal System: An Introduction 92-97 (2002). [Reading: Two Features of the United States Judicial Process]
*Case: scenario case on Stare Decisis
*Sources of law and reference aids
#Introduction to Blue Book (美國法學術論文引註格式)
--------------10/19 before 4 pm: submission of answer to the scenario case on Stare Decisis |
|
第6週 |
10/22 |
Movie: Runaway Jury (127 mins)
*Gerald McAlinn, Dan Rosen and John P. Stern, An Introduction to American Law 31-58 (2005). [The Jury System]
|
|
第7週 |
10/29 |
Class Debate on Whether to Adopt the Jury System in Taiwan
*JOHN J. COUND ET AL., CIVIL PROCEDURE: CASES & MATERIALS 1-17 (7th ed., 1997). [An outline of the procedure in civil action]
*C.H. Beck & Manz Stampfli, Introduction to Anglo-American Law & Language 129-144 (2nd ed., 2001).
*The fifth, sixth, seventh Amendments of the United States Constitution |
|
第8週 |
11/5 |
Midterm Exam (Including the jury movie and class discussion) |
|
第9週 |
11/12 |
3. Judicial process of modern American courts
3.1 The power of judicial review and its limits
3.1.1 Case or controversy
3.1.2 Standing to sue
3.1.3 Ripeness and mootness
3.1.4 Political questions
3.1.5 Stare Decisis Doctrine
11/12
*Article III of the U.S. Constitution
*Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. 83 (1968)
*Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 454 U.S. 464 (1982)
|
|
第10週 |
11/19 |
11/19
*Lujan v. Defender of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992)
*David M. O’Brien, Constitutional Law and Politics Vol. I: Struggles for Power and Government Accountability100-125 (4th ed., 2000)
--------------11/22 before 4 pm: submission of Case Brief on any case from Flast, Valley Forge and Lujan
|
|
第11週 |
11/26 |
3.2. The docket and proceedings of the U.S. Supreme Court
3.2.1 The Rule of Four
3.2.2 Oral arguments in the Supreme Court
3.2.3 Conference deliberation
3.2.4 Writing opinions
*David M. O’Brien, Constitutional Law and Politics Vol. I: Struggles for Power and Government Accountability162-180 (4th ed., 2000) |
|
第12週 |
12/3 |
4. The impacts of court decisions on the society: Watershed cases of the U.S. Supreme Court
4.1 Griswold v. Connecticut: The right of privacy and the revolutionary role of the court to the society
*Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 470 (1965) |
|
第13週 |
12/10 |
4.2 Roe v. Wade
*Movie: If These Walls Could Talk (On Abortion) (97mins)
*Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
--------------12/24 before 4 pm: submission of Case Brief on Roe v. Wade |
|
第14週 |
12/17 |
*LAWRENCE FRIEDMAN, AMERICAN LAW IN THE 20TH CENTURY 457-504 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002) [Internal Legal Culture: The Legal Profession] |
|
第15週 |
12/24 |
-------------- submission of Case Brief |
|
第16週 |
12/31 |
--------------Movie: either from Milk or North Country |
|
第17週 |
1/7 |
Final Exam |
|